Friday, May 29, 2015

JEB! Bush Lacks Key Presidential Quality

Look, I've gotta tell these wingnuts something they
want to hear. I can't just tell them I'm cutting taxes
on war profiteers and sending their jobs overseas
while I send their children back to the Middle East.
They have probably forgotten all about that Schiavo
woman, and they give me such grief now about my
Common Core cronyism and guest worker
compassion for the Chamber of Commerce.
...Is it my tee time?

(Huffington Post) - The recent interview of Jeb Bush by Megyn Kelly of Fox News (aired May 11, 2015) casts serious doubt upon Mr. Bush's qualification to be president of the United States.
One of the most critical qualities of any president is judgment. Therefore, every candidate seeking this high office must clearly possess sound judgment. This includes the ability to perceive facts correctly and assess situations accurately. This quality is absolutely essential.
Now of course candidates will disagree over issues and will indeed offer differing approaches to solving problems. This is perfectly fine and healthy as reasonable minds can reasonably differ.
But basic judgment is a very different matter. It is not fine for any candidate to be unable to accurately perceive and assess fundamental aspects of a situation. If a person fails to perceive the basic reality of a situation, then this person cannot possibly choose a wise course of action to fit the situation and thus is doomed from the start to make very serious mistakes. Such a shortcoming is simply unacceptable for any candidate seeking an office as critical as the president of the United States.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush is afflicted with exactly this crucial shortcoming. It was laid bare during his interview in response to questions about religion and the issue of abortion. Mr. Bush responded with an impassioned defense of his faith and a disturbing interpretation of the constitutional protection of the free exercise of religion. Mr. Bush clearly believes that his religion is under a nationwide attack in violation of the constitution. Read more.

No comments:

Post a Comment