![]() |
Like me or not GOP voters, you're stuck with me! |

Jeb lacks three advantages his brother had. First, the name “Bush” tested much, much better in the late 1990s. Second, as Bloomberg’s David Weigel recently noted, George W. Bush was simply crushing Al Gore, the presumptive 2000 Democratic nominee, in head-to-head polling matchups — often by double digits. When the goal is winning, people like to support the candidate most likely to win. But they also like to support someone who isn’t hostile to them, which is the third problem for Jeb. Unlike his father and his brother, Jeb has done next to nothing to court the base of the party. And, fair or not, many assume he’s hostile to that base.
But let’s say he manages to get the nomination. Is he the best candidate to run against Hillary Clinton? Jeb’s losing to her in the polls right now (as are all the Republicans). The Clinton name unifies Democrats while the Bush name divides Republicans. Moreover, Hillary’s private email fiasco notwithstanding, the Clinton brand and Clinton era are more popular with most Americans than the Bush brand and the Bush era.
Jeb, it seems to me, is the one Republican candidate who makes the Clinton brand name an asset rather than a liability. Read more.
No comments:
Post a Comment